shipping containersOn September 7, 2018, the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), announced a series of significant changes to the current procedures for companies seeking product-specific exclusions to the Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum imports.

Since the announcement in March 2018 of these additional tariffs (25% on imports of steel and 10% on imports of aluminum), there has been tremendous frustration with the exclusion process.  To date, Commerce has received approximately 38,000 tariff exclusion requests and has also received approximately 17,000 objections to such requests.  This has resulted in confusion and backlogs at the administrative level, which has delayed the issuance of rulings.

The new exclusion process announced on Friday and expected to take effect on September 11, 2018, may offer some relief to this cumbersome process.   The main changes are the addition of rebuttal and surrebutal submissions, which will give Commerce more information to consider when weighing the merits of contentious exclusion requests.  While perhaps good in theory, these additional comment periods may simply lead to further delays in issuing exclusion requests.  On a more positive note, the amended rule also provides that, if no objections are filed to a particular exclusion request, Commerce may speed up the process and, if no national security threat is found with respect to the subject imports, it will “expeditiously” grant the request.  In addition, the amended rule provides further detail about the criteria Commerce uses to examine exclusion requests and establishes a range of steel and aluminum product dimensions that can be listed on an exclusion request form, in certain circumstances.

Commerce claims that it “understands the importance of having a transparent, fair and efficient exclusion and objection process.”  The publication of this modified rule could make significant improvements in these respects.  See FR Notice.  However, this can be determined only after implementation of the new procedures.

The net result is likely that for some, the modified rule may offer key and timely relief, while for others the delays and bureaucratic complications may only get exacerbated.

For more information, please contact Nithya Nagarajan, Jeffrey Neeley, Stephen Brophy, or Beau Jackson.

Print:
EmailTweetLikeLinkedIn
Photo of Nithya Nagarajan Nithya Nagarajan

Nithya’s extensive background in U.S. trade issues spans 25 years and includes various roles in a number of federal government agencies, including the Department of Commerce Department of Justice, and the U.S. Court of International Trade. She assists clients with administrative and regulatory…

Nithya’s extensive background in U.S. trade issues spans 25 years and includes various roles in a number of federal government agencies, including the Department of Commerce Department of Justice, and the U.S. Court of International Trade. She assists clients with administrative and regulatory actions before the Department of Commerce, International Trade Commission and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and defends clients in appeals before the Court of International Trade, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, NAFTA panels and the World Trade Organization. In addition to her body of U.S. experience, Nithya is also well-versed in international trade issues in China and India.

Photo of Jeffrey Neeley Jeffrey Neeley

Jeffrey has more than 25 years of experience representing private parties in international trade remedies disputes in the U.S. and in foreign jurisdictions. He guides clients in matters including antidumping investigations, countervailing duties, subsidies, intellectual property disputes as well as related customs, export…

Jeffrey has more than 25 years of experience representing private parties in international trade remedies disputes in the U.S. and in foreign jurisdictions. He guides clients in matters including antidumping investigations, countervailing duties, subsidies, intellectual property disputes as well as related customs, export control, and other import/export issues.

Photo of Beau Jackson Beau Jackson

Beau brings deep experience in international trade litigation, regulation and compliance to Husch Blackwell. His practice focuses on trade and intellectual property disputes, with significant experience handling Section 337 and antidumping and countervailing duty matters before the U.S. International Trade Commission, U.S. Department

Beau brings deep experience in international trade litigation, regulation and compliance to Husch Blackwell. His practice focuses on trade and intellectual property disputes, with significant experience handling Section 337 and antidumping and countervailing duty matters before the U.S. International Trade Commission, U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC), U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.